“How are you fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How you are cut down to the ground, you whho weakened the nations!” These words appear in Isaiah 14:12. Many people, for many centuries, have equated this Lucufer with Satan, the devil. The primary definition in Webster’s dictionary for Lucifer is “…a name of the devil.” Is Lucifer in fact the devil? Let us consider Isaiah 14.
“The burden against Babylon, which Isaiah the son of Amoz did see” (Isaiah 13:1). Chapters 13 & 14 pronounce the burden against Babylon. Isaiah 15:1 says, “The burden of Moab. because in the night Ar of Moab is laid waste, and brought to silence; because in the night Kir of Moab is laid waste, and brought to silence…” Chapters 15 & 16 pronounce the burden against Moab. In Isaiah 17:1, the prophet begins a proclamation against Damascus. He speaks of the burden against Egypt in 19:1. In the following chapters, the text pronounces several more burdens against various nations.
When we read the words of Isaiah 14, it should be understood that this is in the midst of a prophecy against Babylon. Verse 4 specifically says, “…take up this proverb against the king of Babylon…” Satan is not the subject of Isaiah 14, Babylon is, and specifically their king. Hear the words of Adam Clarke on verse 12.
“And although the context speaks explicitly concerning Nebuchadnezzar, yet this has been, I know not why, applied to the chief of the fallen angels, who is most incongruously denominated Lucifer, (the bringer of light!) an epithet as common to him as those of Satan and Devil. That the Holy Spirit by his prophets should call this arch-enemy of God and man the light-bringer, would be strange indeed. But the truth is, the text speaks nothing at all concerning Satan nor his fall, nor the occasion of that fall, which many divines have with great confidence deduced from this text. O how necessary it is to understand the literal meaning of Scripture, that preposterous comments may be prevented!”
Smith’s Bible Dictionary comments on Lucifer, “(light-bearer), found in (Isaiah 14:12) coupled with the epithet “son of the morning,” clearly signifies a “bright star,” and probably what we call the morning star. In this passage it is a symbolical representation of the king of Babylon in his splendor and in his fall. The application of this passage to Satan in his fall from heaven, starting with St. Jerome, likely arises from the fact that Scripture represents the Babylonian empire as a type of tyrannical, self-idolizing power, closely connected with the empire of the Evil One in the Apocalypse.
Let’s take a moment to discuss what the text says about the king of Babylon:
v 4 – Nebuchadnezzar was an oppressor of nations, conquering and destroying. His rise to power was great, and the prophecy against him reveals that his fall would be even more great. The Latin Vulgate renders the “golden city” (madhebah, a Chaldean word) as tributum, acknowledging the wealth that Babylon obtained through tribute. Satan was neither ruler in a “golden city”, nor recipient of monetary tribute.
v 5-6 – Given the identification of the king of Babylon in the previous verse, it follows that the rule of the king of Babylon is under discussion here. His reign of harshness and violence over the nations not only ended, but he himself, formerly the persecutor, became the persecuted.
v 7-8 – Now that judgment has come against the oppressor, the rest of the world experiences peace and joy. The whole earth breaks forth in song. Cypress trees and cedars rejoice because Babylon no longer levelled them for their pleasure and pride.
v 9-11 – An audience of kings from various nations, confined in the damnation of hell, awaits the arrival of Nebuchadnezzar. His impending arrival causes a great stir: such a prominent king, mighty and exalted, brought so low. These humiliated kings taunt, “Have you also become as weak as we? Have you become like us?” His earthly might would be render meaningless in the eternal picture. Maggots and worms consume the celebrated king – what a degrading image!
v 12-14 – First, let us address the word “Lucifer”. Is it a description of Satan? The Hebrew word heilel, means “the morning star”, a bright star which ushers in the new morning. How could “the morning star” be a fit description of the one who first appears in Scripture in the form of a lying serpent in Eden? In no place does the Bible speak favourably of Satan. “The morning star” simply does not accord with any other Scriptural portrayal of Satan.
Was Satan in heaven? Absolutely (Job 1:6; 2:1; Luke 10:18; John 12:31; Revelation 12:9). However, that does not necessitate that Isaiah 14:12 speaks about Satan. In fact, if Satan was in heaven, why should he say, “I will ascend into heaven…” The king of Babylon greedily conferred upon himself this exalted figurative expression. The inspired writer reveals the heart of Nebuchadnezzar to us. Over and over, his lust for power and glory is addressed and in his vanity, he thought himself greater than the Almighty.
v 15-17 In Daniel 4, God gave Nebuchadnezzar a vision. Exoaining the vision, Daniel said, “The tree that you saw, which grew and became strong, whose height reached to the heavens and which could be seen by all the earth… it is you, O king, who have grown and become strong; for your greatness has grown and reaches to the heavens, and your dominion to the end of the earth.” Furthermore, in the vision, the tree would be chopped down and destroyed. Why? So that Nebuchadnezzar might “know that Heaven rules”, and “that the Most High rules in kingdom of men…” Though he was great upon the earth, he would be brought low.
Again, can our text be speaking about Satan? Hear the words of those who gazed at the abased royal, “Is this the man who made the earth tremble…?” I am curious, where in Scripture is Satan every referred to as a man? Our text deals with a man, Nebuchadnezzar, and none other.
The text further declares the judgment against the king of Babylon and Babylon’s offspring.. God would cut off Babylon. Though one might draw upon elements mentioned in Isaiah 14 and attempt to apply these to Satan, the text in no way does so. Any specific application beyond the king of Babylon oversteps the scope of Isaiah’s prophecy, and must be rejected.
Links: YouVersion | GROW magazine
Return to the article archive
