Storehouses in the Hydrological Cycle? Answering the Atheist

Inquiry:

Answering the Atheist, storehouses

Ecclesiastes 1:7 reads, “All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full; unto the place from whence the rivers come, thither they return again.” This is part of a description of the hydrological cycle. However, Job 38:22-23 reads, “Hast thou entered into the treasures of the snow? Or hast thou seen the treasures of the hail, while i have reserved against the time of trouble, against the day of battle and war?” Storehouses are NOT part of the cycle! Is there a contradiction?

Continue reading “Storehouses in the Hydrological Cycle? Answering the Atheist”

What shape is the earth? Answering the Atheist

Inquiry:

Answering the Atheist, earth

What is the shape of the earth? Isaiah 40:22 says, “It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers, that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in.” Yet, Matthew 4:8 reads, “Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them.”

Astronomical bodies are spherical, and you cannot see the entire exterior surface from any place. The kingdoms of Egypt, China, Greece, Crete, sections of Asia Minor, India, Maya (in Mexico), Carthage (North Africa), Rome (Italy), Korea, and other settlements from these kingdoms of the world were widely distributed. Is there a contradiction?

Continue reading “What shape is the earth? Answering the Atheist”

Are birds water or land animals? Answering the Atheist

Inquiry:

Answering the Atheist, birds

Are birds from the water or the ground? Genesis 1:20-21 reads, “And God said, ‘Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creatures that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.’ And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind; and God saw that it was good.” However, Genesis 2:19 reads, “And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.” Is there a contradiction?

Continue reading “Are birds water or land animals? Answering the Atheist”

What? Insects don’t have four feet! Answering the Atheist

Inquiry:

Answering the Atheist, insects

Leviticus 11:21-23 reads, “Yet these may ye eat of every flying creeping thing that goeth upon all four, which have legs above their feet, to leap withal upon the earth; even these of them ye may eat; the locust after his kind, and the bald locust after his kind, and the beetle after his kind, and the grasshopper after his kind. But all other flying creeping things, which have four feet, shall be an abomination unto you.”

Insects do not have four feet! Is there a contradiction?

Continue reading “What? Insects don’t have four feet! Answering the Atheist”

Do rabbits really chew the cud? Answering the Atheist

Inquiry:

Answering the Atheist, rabbits

Leviticus 11:6 reads, “And the hare, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof, he is unclean to you.” Rabbits do not chew the cud!

“Gerah” means to chew cud or also perhaps grain, or berries. It does NOT mean dung, and there is a perfectly adequate Hebrew word for that, which could have been used. Furthermore, the phrase translated “chew the cud” in the KJV is more exactly “bring up the cud”. Rabbits do not bring up anything; they let it go all the way through, then eat it again.

The description given in Leviticus is inaccurate. Rabbits do eat their own dung; they do not bring anything up and chew on it.

Continue reading “Do rabbits really chew the cud? Answering the Atheist”

Why is the bat listed with birds? Answering the Atheist

Inquiry:

Answering the Atheist, bat

The bat is not a bird! In Leviticus 11:13-19, we read, “And these are they which ye shall have in abomination among the fowls; they shall not be eaten, they are an abomination: the eagle, the ossifrage, and the osprey, and the vulture, and the kite after his kind; every raven after his kind, and the owl, and the night hawk, and the cuckow, and the hawk after his kind, and the little owl, and the comorant, and the great owl, and the swan, and the pelican, and the gier eagle, and the stork, the heron after her kind, and the lapwing, and the bat.” Again, Deuteronomy 14:11-18 declares, “Of all clean birds yet shall eat. But these are they of which ye shall not eat: the eagles, and the ossigrage, and the osprey, and the glede, and the kite, and the vulture after his kind, the little owl, and the great owl, and the swan, and the pelican, and the grier eagle, and the cormorant, and the stork, and the heron after her kind, and the lapwing, and the bat.” Is there a contradiction?

Continue reading “Why is the bat listed with birds? Answering the Atheist”
Verified by MonsterInsights